Number of words: 1999
SHR6E037P~002 25105083 Attic Smoother Sounds Event Evaluation
Event Evaluation
Taking into account your role within the project you need to provide an individual evaluation – (2000 words), alongside film and photographic evidence of you effectively managing your event. You should explain the nature and purpose of your inclusion of all evidence and its relevance.
Your evidence should cover the following areas: at least 3 pieces of evidence in each sub category, with all evidence submitted under supporting material.
· Event Atmosphere
· Box Office
· Security
· Health and Safety (you should directly reference points outlined in your groups risk assessment)
· Production (sound and lighting)
· Artists Liaison
· Stage Management
· Online Marketing – This can include websites, social media, forums, blogs etc.
· Promotion – This can include posters, flyers, influence mixes, videos or any other relevant promotional materials.
· Financial outcomes – This should be presented on the settlement template provided on space.
· Only work submitted as part of your evaluation will be counted in the word count. Photographs, video content, online marketing and promotional materials will not be counted in the word count.
· Films should not exceed 7mins total in length and should be edited to show highlights of the event.
1. Event Evidence Video

Video 1.1. The Nightingales (headline band), also showing some audience
Video 1.2. The Nightingales Band
Video 1.3. Jah Glory (myself) and the promoter’s band
2. Event Atmosphere
Our event was held on 9th March 2026, at 7pm at the Attic in Leeds. The atmosphere was enjoyable, peaceful and sober, as envisaged. All bands had fun (Figures 2.1-2.3) and patrons enjoyed the evening, paying attention to and interacting with the bands, despite low turn out. The guests were mainly friends of the bands so it was a good, social atmosphere. The bar staff were helpful and addressed all of our concerns. The venue was spacious with sofas available for comfort (Figure 2.4). There was a courtyard at the back although this was not used as people stayed indoors to enjoy the bands (Figure 2.5).





3. Box Office
Online ticket sales the were sold via Gigantic Ticketing (https://www.gigantic.com/), a free site handling ticketing with a free branded website to host event listings. We used the platform to sell tickets online and sold 3 tickets at £6.30 (general-admission) and 4 tickets at £6.00 (groups). Figure 3.1 shows the remittance received from Gigantic (£43.50) whilst Figure 3.2 shows the excel spreadsheet. Figure 3.3 shows that 7 tickets were sold through 4 orders. Payment was deposited into one team member’s bank account.
The orders show that the platform works well, however tickets sales were low and advertising was probably not sufficient. In fact the venue suggested that we cancel the event due to this, but we decided to go ahead anyway.
Tickets were also sold on the door at £6.00 each. A card reader app (e.g. Sumup for iphones) was investigated to allow easy card payments on the door. However, the team were not able to download the app due to full phones. Instead, we accepted bank transfers to collect door-revenue. 15 people paid this way on the night.
Cash was also allowed, and the team ensured that sufficient change was available. One person paid in cash.
We sold 7 tickets online, 1 with cash and 15 using bank-transfer, i.e. total of 23 tickets, lower than anticipated which was disappointing. In hindsight, we should have done more advertising, investing money to reach wider audiences for a better return (see Sections 7&8).



4. Security
Figure 4.1 shows the entrance to the Attic which has a double shutter safety system so people cannot just wander in. Figure 4.2 shows the inside of the second shutter, with a door designed for single file entry to minimise crowd surge (Figure 5.3).
The outside has two bricked areas which prevents cars from driving into potential crowds outside the venue. Figure 4.3 shows the location on a quiet, one-way street with one main entrance. Figures 4.4 and 4.5 show the venue is protected by high walls and barbed wire. Figure 4.5 shows another exit from the back of the courtyard (Figure 2.4).
Two people were stationed at the box office for security. This was located at the event entrance (wooden desk Figure 4.2). ID was inspected on entry. Bank-transfers were encouraged to avoid large cash sums on site.
A green room was the dedicated safe space to store belongings from the crew and performers.
We planned an easy-listening event to encourage a peaceful crowd to attend. No trouble (fights or drunkenness) was forthcoming. The venue would have intervened should they be needed given they had at least four capable staff on site. No security-guards were stationed at the venue which on this occasion was fine.





5. Health and Safety
Prior to the event, we visited the venue twice for our risk assessment (Document 5.1) which discussed:
- Injury due to poor handling of equipment. All equipment from LCM was transported to the venue by two cars, and parked at the venue door for unloading (Figure 5.1). All team members were aware of safe practice in lifting and handling equipment and there were no injuries.
- Loud sounds. We sound-checked the bands before performance to ensure that volumes were not too high, particularly mic feedback. We were fortunate to get an in-house engineer with the hire of the venue who was familiar with the equipment, stage and room. This enabled a smooth transition through the bands during sound-check and performance.
- Injury due to improper rigging/poor lights. The stage lights were already in place and checked by the local engineer. Sufficient lighting was provided at all times. However, as a performer I was not exposed to the stage lighting until on stage and I was shocked by its blinding effect which was dangerous as the available stage space was small for the vocalist. A lighting check during sound-check was needed but was not carried out.
- Trip/dust hazards. The equipment and engineering desk is all patched into the wall, so cables are not exposed. The walkway and fire exit were kept clear at all times. Care was taken to ensure other items (e.g. instrument cases) were packed away when not in use.
- Fire exit signs were visible and unblocked at all times, with extinguishers available (Figure 5.2/5.3 show different exits). There was a clear assembly point outside. All equipment had been electrically PAT tested and labelled for safety before use.
- No under age drinking or drugs were allowed at the venue as per UK law (https://www.drinkaware.co.uk/facts/information-about-alcohol/alcohol-and-the-law/the-law-on-alcohol-and-under-18s#/overview, https://www.gov.uk/penalties-drug-possession-dealing). The venue also has a zero-drug and Challenge 25 policy. ID was checked at the door to ensure the audience was of age. No minors attended the event as this was an adults only setting.
- First aid. At least one of our team is a first-aider. No defibrillator on site but the closest is at Tesco Express LS10 1JQ, which is 73m away.
- Access. The venue was accessible to all and had appropriate disabled facilities. Figure 5.3 shows the accessible toilet, whilst Figure 5.4 shows the main entrance (clear of steps) and Figure 5.5, the entry way.
- Box office (money) risks and Security/behaviour risks are discussed in Section 4.
Document 5.1: Risk Assessment





6. Production
We were 6 (Figure 6.1). Tasks were divided, including team manager, technical, media, finance, artist liaison and H&S. I was also responsible for transporting equipment. The production team formed a band to maximise the show.
We set up at 5pm. Band sound-check ran smoothly. The venue’s PA and sound was good. Lighting enhanced the atmosphere but as mentioned in section 5, lights on stage were harsh on myself performing. Lights were not tested during sound-check probably because it was bright (Figures 6.2 and 6.3).
Doors opened at 7pm, and our band was first up later than planned due to low numbers. The event finished at 11pm.



7. Artist Liaison
We had an event information pack (Document 7.1) and shared details regularly with all bands. We requested tech-specs and were on-hand to answer queries (Figures 7.2-7.3). We informed bands about parking (Figure 7.4). A green room was provided for artists and we offered assistance throughout the event. One band forgot cymbals and we helped retrieve these. The bands seemed to have had a good night (Figure 2.3). Artist liaison went well overall.
Document 7.1 Information pack (above)



8. Stage Management
The stage lineup was communicated to all bands (Figure 1.1) and sound-check was carried out in reverse order to facilitate smooth change overs (15-minutes). Levels were pre-set for every band.
The piano was on the left of the stage with drums and guitar to the right (Figure 8.1). Bands brought their own instruments except for the piano. We borrowed equipment from LCM (Figure 8.2a/b). There were 3 front stage monitors (left, right and centre) and two guitar amps on stage.
Some equipment (Figure 8.3a/b) was mistakenly left in my car. I discovered this on my return to Newcastle and had to arrange return the following week. In the future, a checklist for equipment should be used at the start/end of the night.





9. Online Marketing
The event was marketed for free using our personal social media sites, including instagram and facebook (Figures 9.1a/b/c) plus the ticket sales site, Gigantic (Figure 9.2). We did not pay for advertising and this may have proved to be a mistake due to low ticket sales.




10. Promotional Materials
We promoted the event at the cafe bar using a stall with various posters (Figure 10.1) 12 to 2:30pm on Tuesday/Thursday 1/3 March 2026 (Figures 10.2 and 10.3). We put up posters around LCM and on various notice-boards. We also advertised by distributing fliers in person at the entrance to LCM, the bus terminal and Victoria market and placed fliers in various venues e.g. Oporto, Northern Guitar and Ibis hotel. We had a signboard outside the venue advertising the event to encourage passer-bys to attend (Figure 1.1). The posters looked good and were received. However, more advertising was needed.



11. Financial Outcomes
Revenue:
In our original event costings, we planned to sell 180 tickets, as the venue holds 200 people (Figure 11.1). We had blocked 20 tickets for ourselves and bands. We planned to sell tickets at £6.30, giving maximum ticket sales of £1170.
Our planned ticket sales were rather ambitions: for our event, we only sold 23 tickets (Section 3: Box Office) giving a total of only £139.50 income, i.e. £1030.50 below the maximum ticket sales potential revenue.
Outgoings:
We spent £180 on the venue hire, £30 for the piano hire and PRS costs were £7.05 (see Figure 11.3 deposit paid, Figure 11.4 remaining invoice including PRS costs, and Figure 11.5 total payable amount/paid), i.e. a total of £217.05.
The PRS costs were lower than anticipated (£49.14 Figure 11.1) as these fees are typically calculated as a percentage of gross ticket sales (box office receipts). PRS fees are currently 4.2%+VAT (https://www.makingmusic.org.uk/resource/prs-licence-cost#:~:text=PRS%20fees%20are%20typically%20based,popular%20music%20have%20different%20tariffs.).
We had budgeted £20 for local ads and promotional activities and £20 contingency (Figure 11.1), however we used free social media advertising so we did not spend the ad money. Instead we paid two taxis, required for moving band equipment borrowed from LCM, at £11.57 (Figure 11.6 and 11.7).
We planned to pay the bands £240 (£80 each for three bands), although bands were aware that this figure may change if ticket sales were low. Following our event, we agreed to pay individual band members £15 each. The Nightingales received £75, and the Tangerines received £45. Supporting acts Isaac Aylward and Jah Glory, agreed their services for free. Total band expenditure was therefore £120 (Figure 11.2). Although not ideal, this meant that we paid the bands that we had originally agreed to pay. It was fortunate for us that the other two acts (including our group’s band) did not request further payment.
Balance:
Our maximum profit margin was £630.86 (Figure 11.1). We had considered that if half (120) tickets were sold, then the income from ticket sales alone would reduce from £1170 to £585, leaving a profit margin of £45. If only a third (60) tickets were sold, then the income would reduce to £390, leaving us £180 in arrears. To manage this cost deficit, we would need to cover this cost ourselves ie £30 each between 6. In the worst case scenario, if no tickets were sold, the maximum we would owe is £90 each. We did not envisage this scenario but we only sold 23 tickets.
Our final balance is £209.12 in arrears. Each of us (6 team members) therefore contributed £34.85 each to make up the balance.
We were lucky that we were able to make up the losses to nobody’s detriment, and it was overall, a small cost to pay for the experience of organising such an event, as this was our first time. Bar revenue was probably low so perhaps the venue was not so happy. However, the event took place on a Monday night, which does not attract large crowds at the best of times.
The Monday night booking was due to our group’s procrastination over confirming the venue as dates were initially available for the Wednesday or Thursday, but we missed these. We also didn’t check with many venues to see if our preferred dates were available. With hindsight, we could therefore have secured a better day of the week in this or an alternative venue to attract better crowds.







Bibliography
- Drink Aware: The law on alcohol and under 18s website (website) https://www.drinkaware.co.uk/facts/information-about-alcohol/alcohol-and-the-law/the-law-on-alcohol-and-under-18s#/overview (accessed 10 April 2026)
- Eventbrite: What a Performance! The Gig Checklist For Killing It as an Artist Liaison (website) https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/blog/academy/gig-checklist-ds00/ (accessed 9 February 2026)
- Beach EF and Gilliver M (2019) Time to Listen: Most Regular Patrons of Music Venues Prefer Lower Volumes. Front. Psychol. 10:607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00607Gigantic Ticketing Platform (website) https://www.gigantic.com/
- Carah, N., Regan, S., Goold, L., Rangiah, L., Miller, P., & Ferris, J. (2021). Original live music venues in hyper-commercialised nightlife precincts: exploring how venue owners and managers navigate cultural, commercial and regulatory forces. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(5), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1830979
- GigPig Top Tips For Looking After Music Artists At Your Venue (website) https://www.gigpig.uk/insights/top-tips-for-looking-after-music-artists-at-your-venue (accessed 9 February 2026)
- Harrowgate convention centre: MARTYN’S LAW: Essential Resources for Venues and Event Organisers (websoite) https://www.harrogateconventioncentre.co.uk/blog/martyns-law-essential-resources-for-venues-and-event-organisers (accessed 9 February 2026)
- Institute of Contemporary Music Performance How to Organise and Promote Live Music Events (website) https://www.icmp.ac.uk/blog/how-organise-and-promote-live-music-events (accessed November 2025)
- HSE Executive: Venue and site design (website) https://www.hse.gov.uk/event-safety/venue-site-design.htm (accessed 9 February 2026)
- Isaac Aylward (website) https://epkbuilder.com/site/isaac-aylward (accessed 5 February 2026)
- Jah Glory (spotify website) – https://open.spotify.com/artist/3ApgMoGeF8AeUEtYrJ61pYhttps://open.spotify.com/artist/3ApgMoGeF8AeUEtYrJ61pY
- Making music: PRS Licence Cost (website): https://www.makingmusic.org.uk/resource/prs-licence-cost#:~:text=PRS%20fees%20are%20typically%20based,popular%20music%20have%20different%20tariffs (accessed 5 April 2026)
- Manners, B., Saayman, M., Kruger, M., 2015, ‘Managing a live music performance: A supply-side analysis’, Acta Commercii 15(1), Art. #252, 11 pages. (article) http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ac.v15i1.252 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277655004_Managing_a_live_music_performance_A_supply-side_analysis
- Musician’s Union: Showcasing Your Music (website) https://musiciansunion.org.uk/career-development/career-guides/marketing-and-promotion/showcasing-your-music (accessed 28 March 2026)
- Music Venue Trust (website) https://www.musicvenuetrust.com/ (accessed 15 December 2026)
- Parkinson, Tom and Hunter, Mark and Campanello, Kimberly and Dines, Mike and Dylan Smith, Gareth (2015) Understanding Small Music Venues: A report by the Music Venues Trust. Project report. UK Music, London, UK (KAR id:70372)
- PRS for Music (website)– https://www.prsformusic.com (accessed 10 April 2026)
- Scope: Checking the accessibility of an event or venue (website) https://www.scope.org.uk/advice-and-support/checking-event-venue-accessibility (accessed 9 February 2026)
- The Attic (website) https://www.launchpad-music.com/supported-projects/theattic (accessed 10 April 2026)
- Weezevent: How to organise a concert in 8 steps. (website) https://weezevent.com/en-gb/blog/organise-a-concert/
- UK Parliament Standard Conditions of Hire for Functions and Events (website) https://www.parliament.uk/visiting/venue-hire/commons/terms/ (accessed 9 February 2026)
- Last minute musician blog: How Much Does It Cost to Hire a Musician in the UK? 2026 (website) https://www.lastminutemusicians.com/blog/i-charge-real-world-advice-performing-musician/ (accessed March 2026)
- UK Intellectual Property Office: Performers’ rights. (website) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/performers-rights/performers-rights (accessed 28 March 2026)